Blog

Home > Blog >

Copper Fittings in Bathroom Plumbing: Impact of Electropolishing on Flow Resistance & Hydraulic Performance

author: Hongwang Fitting   update: 18 January 2026

1. Introduction to Ultra-High-Pressure (UHP) Cleaning Systems

Ultra-high-pressure (UHP) cleaning equipment (operating at 3000–7000 bar) is used in industrial applications such as:

Surface Preparation: Removing coatings from ship hulls.

Concrete Rehabilitation: Breaking down hardened cement.

Food Processing: Sanitizing equipment without chemicals.

Key Components:

Pump Unit: Generates pressure (e.g., plunger pumps).

High-Pressure Hose: Transmits fluid (rated for ≥7000 bar).

Seamless Fittings: Connect hoses, nozzles, and manifolds (critical for safety).

Why Stainless Steel (SS)?

Corrosion Resistance: Withstands waterjet erosion and chemical additives.

High Tensile Strength: Sustains pulsating pressures without deformation.

Seamless Design: Eliminates weld defects (common failure points in welded fittings).

2. Burst Pressure Testing: Theory & Standards

Burst Pressure (P_burst): The pressure at which a fitting fails catastrophically (ruptures).

2.1 Theoretical Calculation (Barlow’s Formula)

For cylindrical fittings (e.g., elbows, tees):

Pburst​=D2⋅S⋅t​

S: Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of SS (e.g., 520 MPa for 316L).

t: Wall thickness (mm).

D: Outer diameter (mm).

Example: For a 1" (25.4 mm OD) 316L elbow with t=3mm:

Pburst​=25.42⋅520⋅3​=123MPa(12.300bar)

Note: Actual burst pressure is lower due to stress concentrations at bends.

2.2 Industry Standards

ASME B31.3: Requires fittings to withstand 4× operating pressure (e.g., 12.000 bar for 3000 bar systems).

ISO 11483: Specifies burst test procedures for UHP components.

EN 10204 3.2: Certification for material traceability and test reports.

3. Burst Pressure Test Setup & Procedure

3.1 Test Equipment

Hydrostatic Test Pump: Capable of ≥10.000 bar (e.g., diesel-driven intensifier).

Pressure Transducer: Calibrated to ±0.5% accuracy.

Data Acquisition System: Records pressure vs. time at 100 Hz sampling rate.

Safety Shield: Blast-resistant enclosure to contain fragments.

3.2 Test Steps

Pre-Test Inspection: Verify fittings are free of scratches/dents (NDT methods like MPI or X-ray).

Mounting: Secure fitting between flanges with O-ring seals (rated for UHP).

Pressurization:

Increase pressure at 100 bar/s until failure.

Record burst pressure and failure mode (e.g., longitudinal split, circumferential rupture).

Post-Test Analysis: Examine fracture surface via SEM to identify fatigue or brittle failure.

Visualization: Include a test rig schematic (Fig. 1) showing pump, pressure gauge, and shielded test cell.

4. FEA Validation: Stress Distribution in Seamless Fittings

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) predicts stress hotspots before physical testing.

4.1 Model Setup

Geometry: 3D CAD model of a 90° elbow (1" schedule 80).

Material Properties: 316L SS (UTS = 520 MPa, Yield = 205 MPa).

Boundary Conditions:

Fixed end at flange connection.

Internal pressure = 3000 bar (operating) and 12.000 bar (burst test).

4.2 Key Findings

Stress Concentrations: Occur at intrados (inner bend) due to hoop stress amplification.

Safety Factor:

At 3000 bar: Max stress = 180 MPa (SF = 520/180 = 2.9).

At 12.000 bar: Max stress = 720 MPa (SF = 520/720 = 0.72 → failure imminent).

Visualization: Include FEA stress contours (Fig. 2) showing high-stress zones in red.

5. Common Failure Modes & Root Causes

Failure ModeRoot CauseMitigation Strategy
Longitudinal SplitExcessive hoop stress at intradosIncrease wall thickness or use thicker schedule
Circumferential RuptureRadial stress at flange connectionAdd reinforcing collars
Leak Before BurstMicro-cracks from poor heat treatmentUse solution-annealed 316L with grain size ≤ ASTM 5

6. Case Study: Burst Testing of 2" 316L Tees

A manufacturer tested 10 samples of 2" schedule 160 tees (316L SS) at 9000 bar:

Average Burst Pressure: 9.800 bar (meets ASME B31.3 requirement of 12.000 bar for 3000 bar systems).

Failure Mode: 80% longitudinal splits at tee branch, 20% circumferential ruptures at main body.

Design Improvement: Added fillet radius at branch junction to reduce stress concentration by 35%.

7. Compliance & Certification

Third-Party Inspection: TÜV or Lloyd’s Register to witness burst tests and issue EN 10204 3.2 certificates.

Traceability: Laser-etched serial numbers linking fittings to batch test reports.

Marking Requirements: Include material grade (e.g., "316L"), pressure rating (e.g., "PN7000"), and manufacturer logo.

8. Best Practices for UHP Fitting Selection

Material Grade: Prefer 316L over 304 for superior chloride resistance.

Wall Thickness: Use schedule 160 or higher for diameters >1".

Surface Finish: Electropolish to Ra ≤ 0.8 µm to minimize erosion.

Connection Type: Avoid threaded fittings; use orbital welded or compression fittings.

Regular Inspection: Replace fittings every 2000 hours or if pitting is detected.

9. Conclusion

Burst pressure testing is critical for ensuring the safety of stainless steel seamless fittings in UHP cleaning systems. Key takeaways:

Theoretical calculations (Barlow’s formula) provide initial estimates but must be validated via FEA and physical testing.

ASME B31.3 requires fittings to withstand 4× operating pressure (e.g., 12.000 bar for 3000 bar systems).

FEA optimization (e.g., fillet radii at bends) can reduce burst pressure variability by up to 40%.

By following these guidelines, manufacturers can achieve 99.9% reliability in UHP applications while minimizing downtime and liability risks.

Products

WhatsApp

Phone

Email

Connect With US